Hi Stanislav, I think this is an excellent idea to use distributed metastore.
Should I leave system property for backward compatibility? On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 19:04, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, 9 May 2021, 21:33 Stanislav Lukyanov, <stanlukya...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Eduard, > > > > I strongly believe that if a configuration option is cluster wide then it > > belongs to distributed metastore and not to IgniteConfiguration. > > This allows to get cluster-wide consistency guarantees and API for > dynamic > > change out of the box (need to teach the internals to re-read the > property > > from DMS every time of course). > > > > WDYT? > > > > Stan > > > > > On 6 May 2021, at 16:35, Eduard Rakhmankulov <erixon...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Some addition. > > > > > > I want to add configuration to > > > > > > org.apache.ignite.configuration.DataStorageConfiguration#getDefaultWarmUpConfiguration#getP > > > artitionWalRebalanceThreshold > > > which will have same semantics as system property (number of entries in > > WAL > > > to trigger rebalance). > > > > > > On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 15:50, Eduard Rakhmankulov <erixon...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello, Igniters! > > >> > > >> I suggest changing IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from system > > >> properties to IgniteConfiguration. > > >> This configuration is effectively cluster-wide (because only the > > >> coordinator's configuration matters when the heuristic with this > > property > > >> applies). > > >> > > >> It is easier to validate that we have the same configuration on all > > nodes > > >> than system property (in the case when another coordinator was > elected). > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best regards, Eduard. > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > С уважением, Рахманкулов Э.Р. > > > > > -- С уважением, Рахманкулов Э.Р.
