+ for both -- Regards, Konstantin Orlov
> On 20 Jul 2021, at 16:32, Pavel Tupitsyn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agree with for both points > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:14 PM Alexander Polovtcev <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> this is a very welcome change for me >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:13 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> + for both points. >>> >>> 2021-07-20 9:56 GMT+03:00, Ivan Daschinsky <[email protected]>: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Firstly, lets talk about interfaces. >>>> >>>> 1. First of all, do we have an automatic inspection for it? AFAIK we >>> don't >>>> 2. I am for consistency. At least for production code. Nothing worse is >>>> when someone mixes both approaches. >>>> >>>> About a prohibition of curly brackets around one line -- I am strongly >>>> against this rule, it should be removed. There were a few bugs that >> this >>>> rule caused. >>>> >>>> вт, 20 июл. 2021 г. в 09:23, Zhenya Stanilovsky >>> <[email protected] >>>>> : >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Igniters, i understand that this is very long and fundamental story. >> but >>>>> … still want to rise up this discussion, we have 2 very strange >>>>> inspections: >>>>> * «public» modifier in interface methods. >>>>> * Illegal ‘{}’ for one line statement. — i found it harmful. >>>>> I don`t want to link additional discussion about pos. 2 i think that >>> harm >>>>> is obvious. >>>>> I suggest to get rid of them. >>>>> >>>>> what do you think ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Ivan Pavlukhin >>> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> Aleksandr Polovtcev >>
