Ivan,

Great job. PR looks good.

This allocator in interleaved mode and passing `-XX:+UseNUMA` flag to jvm
> show promising results on yardstick benches. Technically, G1 is not a numa
> aware collector for java versions less than 14, but allocation of heap in
> interleaved mode shows good results even on java 11.

Can you share benchmark results?
I'm not sure I'll have an Optane on my notebook in a reasonable time ;)


On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:41 AM Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Semyon D. and Maks T. -- thanks a lot for review.
>
> BTW, Igniters, I will appreciate all opinions and feedback.
>
> пн, 29 нояб. 2021 г. в 10:13, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi, igniters!
> >
> > There is not a big secret that nowadays NUMA is quite common in
> > multiprocessor systems.
> > And this memory architecture should be treated in specific ways.
> >
> > Support for NUMA is present in many commercial and open-source products.
> >
> > I've implemented a NUMA aware allocator for Apache Ignite [1]
> > It is a JNI wrapper around `libnuma` and supports different allocation
> > options.
> > I.e. interleaved, local, interleved_mask and so on. For more information,
> > see
> > [2], [3].
> > This allocator in interleaved mode and passing `-XX:+UseNUMA` flag to jvm
> > show promising results on yardstick benches. Technically, G1 is not a
> numa
> > aware collector for java versions less than 14, but allocation of heap in
> > interleaved mode shows good results even on java 11.
> >
> > Currently, all needed libraries and tools for building this module are
> > available on TC agents
> > setup of specific test suite is in progress [4]
> >
> > So I am asking for a review of my patch.
> >
> > [1] --  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15922
> > [2] -- https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/numa.3.html
> > [3] -- https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/mbind.2.html
> > [4] -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15994
> >
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrey V. Mashenkov

Reply via email to