Why couldn't the handlers be annotated? I think Kirill Gusakov (as the feature contributor) can give some ideas about what and how should be annotated. This may require some tweaking.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 6:06 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov <apk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > Yes, swagger allows to annotate classes > and then the spec will be generated. But > here is a question. What classes should we > annotade? > > Web framework brings the convention about > how to write an endpoint and what to annotate. > Our own REST server implementation does not. > It is just the number of handlers. > > > On 25 May 2022, at 17:46, Alexander Polovtcev <alexpolovt...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Aleksandr, > > > > Can we use these annotations without the micronaut dependencies? If yes, > > why do we need micronaut at all? > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:34 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov <apk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Yes, swagger-core has its own set of annotations [1] > >> > >> [1] > >> https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/wiki/Swagger-2.X---Annotations#quick-annotation-overview > >> > >>> On 23 May 2022, at 12:37, Alexander Polovtcev <alexpolovt...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm not that scared of having a big library, I just believe that it might > >>> be possible to avoid using it altogether. Don't swagger generators have > >>> their own annotations? > >> > >> > > >
