Mostly, yes. In other words - proposal is about starting shipping Apache Ignite releases with JDK11 compiled binaries thus dropping JDK8-10 runtime support.
пт, 25 авг. 2023 г. в 12:03, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > I looks like you're proposing not migration to 2.11 (because it is already > supported), but Java 8-9 support dropping. > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:54 AM Peter Ivanov <vvei...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi, Igniters! > > > > > > I would like to propose the next, if you don't mind me saying, > > revolutionary step forward in our project: moving Ignite 2.x compilation > to > > JDK11 minimum version. > > I'd rather not make arguments, pros and cons other that currently exist > in > > Java world - you know them better than me. Let's just say that it seems > > that time has come - consider at least that JDK11 as the LTS version is > > already about 4 and a half years on the go, and Ignite 3.x started from > > JDK11 right away. > > > > This change may possibly require from us additional efforts on supporting > > the last version with JDK8 in terms of releasing additional patches and > > hotfixes a bit longer than usual. However, this is up to the community to > > decide. > > > > Currently, Apache Ignite 2.x (with Extensions as well) is already > prepared > > for being compiled with JDK11 and almost all tests are passing. If we > come > > to an agreement about this proposal and designate the next version that > > will become the first to provide JDK11 compiled binaries - I am ready to > > start the process of updating the TeamCity building project accordingly. > > > > > > Please, share your thoughts. > > >
