++1 for switch to the OpenJDK framework As to original question, I propose to (step-by-step): 1) Switch to java 11 testing instead of 8 2) Fix java 11 release 3) Switch to maven.compiler.source 11 (Vote required)
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:12 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> wrote: > ++1 for testing using JDK11 > > +0 for switching off support of JDK8 runtimes and class version (unless > compilation using JDK11 is done with -target=1.8 our users won't be able to > run Ignite using Java 8). > > I suggest the following next steps: once tests are completely fine on > Teamcity using JDK 11, we start a separate thread named like: > "[VOTE] discontinuing JDK 8 since the 2.16 release" > to make the issue for end users more obvious. Since Nikita volunteers to be > a Release Manager, I suppose that 2.16 will be released quite soon. > > I personally prefer to switch to newer Java. Using newer runtime helps us > to provide speed and scale, since JVM is developed all the time. But I > might be unaware of the risks, so let's discuss it later with the entire > dev community. > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > ср, 30 авг. 2023 г. в 19:09, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > > > +1, sounds reasonable for the open source project. IMHO, Eclipse Temurin > > JDK is a rule of thumb choice nowadays. > > > > ср, 30 авг. 2023 г. в 18:40, Peter Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi, Igniters! > > > > > > As part of this proposal I would also like to discuss the JDK vendors > we > > > are using on our CI platforms TeamCIty. > > > Historically, Ignite 2.x is being built under Oracle's edition - mostly > > > because of some features like JFR or similar. > > > However today we have pretty much solid alternative represented by > > OpenJDK > > > and its most popular build Eclipse Temurin, which provides every > required > > > version for our needs (and especially LTS versions 1.8, 11 and 17) with > > all > > > necessary updates. > > > > > > So, I suggest we update our build agents for TeamCity accordingly, > > provide > > > OpenJDK framework for those 3 major versions and discontinue Oracle's > > > builds. > > > WDYT? > > > > > > пт, 25 авг. 2023 г. в 12:13, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > +1. It's time to do it at last. > > > > > > > > пт, 25 авг. 2023 г. в 12:06, Peter Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Mostly, yes. > > > > > > > > > > In other words - proposal is about starting shipping Apache Ignite > > > > releases > > > > > with JDK11 compiled binaries thus dropping JDK8-10 runtime support. > > > > > > > > > > пт, 25 авг. 2023 г. в 12:03, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > I looks like you're proposing not migration to 2.11 (because it > is > > > > > already > > > > > > supported), but Java 8-9 support dropping. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:54 AM Peter Ivanov < > vvei...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Igniters! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to propose the next, if you don't mind me saying, > > > > > > > revolutionary step forward in our project: moving Ignite 2.x > > > > > compilation > > > > > > to > > > > > > > JDK11 minimum version. > > > > > > > I'd rather not make arguments, pros and cons other that > currently > > > > exist > > > > > > in > > > > > > > Java world - you know them better than me. Let's just say that > it > > > > seems > > > > > > > that time has come - consider at least that JDK11 as the LTS > > > version > > > > is > > > > > > > already about 4 and a half years on the go, and Ignite 3.x > > started > > > > from > > > > > > > JDK11 right away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This change may possibly require from us additional efforts on > > > > > supporting > > > > > > > the last version with JDK8 in terms of releasing additional > > patches > > > > and > > > > > > > hotfixes a bit longer than usual. However, this is up to the > > > > community > > > > > to > > > > > > > decide. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, Apache Ignite 2.x (with Extensions as well) is > already > > > > > > prepared > > > > > > > for being compiled with JDK11 and almost all tests are passing. > > If > > > we > > > > > > come > > > > > > > to an agreement about this proposal and designate the next > > version > > > > that > > > > > > > will become the first to provide JDK11 compiled binaries - I am > > > ready > > > > > to > > > > > > > start the process of updating the TeamCity building project > > > > > accordingly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please, share your thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > >
