To wrap this up: could anyone post the tally of the vote so the thread can be closed?
Cos On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:15PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > Dmitriy, please provide the link to winner. > > > -- > Yakov Zhdanov, Director R&D > *GridGain Systems* > www.gridgain.com > > 2014-11-07 11:13 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]>: > > > The votes were casted here, but mostly they were casted on 99designs > > website (the link was sent out), and then the final version was worked out > > directly with the designer. > > > > It was the version picked by a majority (I, for instance, picked a > > different one). > > > > D. > > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Not to be picky, but if votes were casted it should have happened on the > > > dev@ > > > where the [VOTE] started. Did I miss anything? > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:11PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > > > Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback > > (got > > > > over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached. > > > > > > > > Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked > > > bad > > > > on smaller versions of the logo. > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, > > as > > > > > Stack > > > > > has alluded ;) > > > > > > > > > > If STV is accepted for the method of tally then: > > > > > > > > > > 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!) > > > > > 2. #560 > > > > > 3. #60 > > > > > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > > > > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote: > > > > > > > Engineers are bad at graphics. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of > > > pre-press, > > > > > > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of > > the > > > > > > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory > > > > > > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we > > do > > > some > > > > > > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'. > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] > > (which > > > is > > > > > > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to > > > give a > > > > > > reasonable result. > > > > > > > > > > > > My choice then would be: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. #200 > > > > > > 2. #135 > > > > > > 3. #560 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Brane > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally > > the > > > > > > results > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > > > > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting > > > > > > > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
