+1 I still recommend you not to include RC# into top-level directory name when you create the zip file. RC is a logical state of the archive - not its physical property. Also, earlier I commented on how the checksums will be screwed if you try to re-pack the archive.
Cos On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 06:29AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > I am resubmitting 1.0 RC3 for a vote having addressed comments from Brane > about some binaries in the project. > > I have uploaded the new RC3 release candidate to: > http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/ignite-1.0.0-RC3 > > GIT tag: release-1.0.0-RC3 (I deleted the old RC3 tag and created the new > one) > > The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for the > previous RC3: > > 1. removed > ./modules/core/src/main/java/META-INF/native/linux64/libigniteshmem.so > 2. removed ./modules/core/src/main/java/META-INF/native/osx/ > libigniteshmem.dylib > 3. removed ./bin/include/igniteservice.exe > 4. added check for JDK version to maven build > 5. generated zip file with command: "zip -r9 release-file.zip release-file" > > Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available > in DEVNOTES.txt file. > > Please start voting. > > +1 - to accept the RC3 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 > 0 - don't care either way > -1 - DO NOT accept RC3 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 (explain why)
