Actually this silence is my main concern here :) We're going the change the process. And everyone in the community has to move to the new process at the same time. I have nothing against consensus concept, but IMHO there should be some formal indicator. Such a vote (if we do not apply majority rules to it) can be one of them - when the vote is closed, decision is made. Are there other options?
-Val On Jun 11, 2015 12:03 AM, "Branko Čibej" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11.06.2015 01:47, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: > > Hmm. I'm not sure I understand. As far as I understand, any vote here > > is unanimous, but not majority. I.e., if anyone in community has > > objections, vote is declined (already not a democracy, right? :) ). If > so, > > I really don't see any difference between "consensus is recorded by no > > objections > > being raised" and "consensus is recorded by the vote being passed". > > See again re "silent consensus". It's an informal process. Voting is > formal and by definition implies that the majority rules. Consensus > implies something else entirely. A -1 vote can be overridden by others. > An objection during silent consensus process cannot. > > -- Brane > >
