I don't think we need to bump a major version to remove something that we
never claimed to support though. The docs are pretty clear:

https://impala.apache.org/docs/build/html/topics/impala_allow_unsupported_formats.html

"An obsolete query option from early work on support for file formats. Do
not use. Might be removed in the future."

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:16 PM, Jim Apple <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As for the time zone case, I’d like to be careful about versioning. If we
> remove Avro, that seems like a breaking changedeserving of a major version
> bump.
>
> It might be worth taking a survey wider than dev@. User@ or the customers
> of Impala packagers might be good places to start.
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:10 PM Tim Armstrong
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > For a few years now we've had write support for Sequence, Avro and
> > compressed text hidden behind a query option. We haven't really made any
> > progress on turning it into a supported feature, so I'm wondering if we
> > should remove the code and save some overhead of building, testing and
> code
> > maintenance.
> >
> > I know I've found it useful once or twice to generate test data but I
> don't
> > think this is enough to justify maintaining it.
> >
> > It seems like we should get it out of this in-between state - either
> delete
> > the code or get it to the point where it's supported and tested. If we
> > delete it, it's always possible for someone to resurrect it later.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > - Tim
> >
>

Reply via email to