Thanks for the feedback!
No objections came agains the release so let me continue with the next
steps. I see that the ORC complex types just got into the repo so I propose
to cut the release there (inclusive):

9686545 IMPALA-6503: Support reading complex types from ORC

In case there is anything before this commit that you are not sure and
prefer to omit from the release please let me know. Similarly, if there is
anything that is not ready but is right around the corner and you insist to
include it to the release, let me know.

>From doc's perspective I'm curious how far we are from having coverage for
the proposed changes.

Having a release notes doc is a good idea. Once we agree on the content
I'll create one and share it with the community so that each contributor
can fill in their change's description.

Cheers,
Gabor


On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:28 PM Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> +1 - what Jim said!
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 to both a release and a habit of curated release notes as Quanlong
> > suggests.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:54 AM Quanlong Huang <huangquanl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1. Thanks for your volunteer!
> > >
> > > If we decide to release, could we manage a doc that everyone can write
> > down
> > > his/her notable works in this version? Got this idea from the Kudu
> > > community and feel it very helpful:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a10a4d244369f43b97c79513f13766c393a98252d3a2dade7611cc3@%3Cdev.kudu.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Quanlong
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:18 PM Gabor Kaszab <gaborkas...@cloudera.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
> > > > 3.1.0 has been released at the beginning of December and I feel that
> > since
> > > > then there are a number of bug fixes and improvements checked in.
> > > > What do you think about releasing 3.2.0 soon? I volunteer as a
> release
> > > > manager in case no one is against.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Gabor
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to