OK, we're all set on the builds@ list. According to the confirmation email, "it will appear on https://lists.apache.org/ within a few minutes of the first post to it."
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 5:38 PM Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Thanks Jim! > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:06 AM Jim Apple <apa...@jbapple.com> wrote: > > > SG; submitted request for builds@ > > > > Tim, I made you and I moderators. You're welcome to decline. :-) > Volunteers > > are welcome, but I expect zero moderation work - I set the list to > > "subscribers can post; all others are rejected", so no moderation > messages > > should show up. > > > > The form said it will be acted on in 24 hours and the PMC will be > informed > > when the mailing list is ready. > > > > Also, FWIW, aside from Docker, AWS supports some ARM EC2 types. > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 4:22 PM Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I think we got stalled here. I never got anywhere with configuring > > commits@ > > > to accept emails from openlab and not sure that it's possible. > > > > > > In order to get something going, my suggestion is to copy what Kudu did > > and > > > have this go to a custom mailing list. If you follow the thread here it > > > describes what they did > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfcd230882ec34171462a0c8c53ef6e8efcad50c9d67f8da18a508d07%40%3Cdev.kudu.apache.org%3E > > > > > > Jim, it looks like the PMC chair is needed to create a new mailing list > > via > > > https://selfserve.apache.org/ (see > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20604), so maybe we can go > > > ahead with that route? > > > > > > - Tim > > > > > > I think it would be good to run the tests on impala.jenkins.io but I > > don't > > > want to hold up things further. Another interesting technology is the > ARM > > > emulation support in Docker. > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 8:53 PM Jim Apple <jbap...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > I'm very excited about this development! I don't see any jobs at > > > > status.openlabtesting.org, though -- is > > > > > > http://status.openlabtesting.org/builds?job_name=impala-build-test-arm64 > > > > the right link? Maybe only the owner of a job can see it? > > > > > > > > As far as the price, based on https://ec2instances.info/, you might > be > > > > able > > > > to eyeball the cost. I'm no longer a Jenkins admin, so I'll let the > > other > > > > community members who are admins speak more to this, if it seems > > > > feasible to them. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 2:31 AM Tianhua huang < > > huangtianhua...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I am sorry there is no API with Openlab. But we use ZUUL in our > > system, > > > > you > > > > > can call ZUUL api to get the job information, > > > > > simple like: curl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://status.openlabtesting.org/api/builds?job_name=impala-build-test-arm64 > > > > > | python -m json.tool > > > > > The result we will get is jobs info of 'impala-build-test-arm64', > > > > including > > > > > job status, job log url and so on, I am not sure if we can > integrate > > > with > > > > > the job info into impala.jenkins.io? Then the arm job still runs > > > > triggered > > > > > by OpenLab, and jenkins.impala.io only to get the result and show > > > > > the result in it. > > > > > > > > > > Not sure it's worth doing this, maybe let > comm...@impala.apache.org > > > > allow > > > > > receiving the result email from Openlab is more easy:) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:03 AM Shant Hovsepian < > > > > > sh...@superdupershant.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be possible to setup an API Key or webhook with > > > > openlabstesting? > > > > > > > > > > > > Then we'd have an Impala Jenkins job that uses the API to call > > > > > > openlabstesting to do the build and report the results back. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Shant > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:24 PM Tianhua huang < > > > > > huangtianhua...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Shant, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your reply, maybe it's a good idea to trigger arm > > > testing > > > > by > > > > > > > jenkins.impala.io, we can donate an arm instance, but I don't > > know > > > > how > > > > > > to > > > > > > > do it. Maybe the Jenkins owner of Impala can help me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 2:46 AM Shant Hovsepian < > > > > > > sh...@superdupershant.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Great work Tianhua! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a very exciting enhancement. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev@ isn't usually meant for automated test run output. > Would > > it > > > > be > > > > > > > > possible to get the openlabtesting runs triggered by > > > > > jenkins.impala.io > > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > have the results of the test run come from that jenkins > > instance? > > > > > This > > > > > > > > should solve the email problem as the notification can come > > from > > > > the > > > > > > > > jenkins account and still give us one centralized place to > look > > > at > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > test statuses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Shant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:08 AM Tianhua huang < > > > > > > huangtianhua...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Impala can run/test on arm64 platform after our efforts, > the > > > > issues > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > fixed you can find in > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9376 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are particularly grateful to Tim and Quanlong for their > > > help, > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > very much! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I have integrated Impala arm64 CI with OpenLab( > > > > > > > > > https://openlabtesting.org/ , a community to do open > source > > > > > project > > > > > > > > > testing), > > > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://status.openlabtesting.org/builds?job_name=impala-build-test-arm64 > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > periodic test job runs for a few days already and runs once > > per > > > > > day. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim suggested us to send the arm64 test result to > > > > > > > > > comm...@impala.apache.org, > > > > > > > > > but seems it can receive the emails only ncome from @ > > > apache.org. > > > > > > > > > Now I wonder if we can send the test result to Impala > > community > > > > > > > maillist > > > > > > > > > here dev@impala.apache.org, to tell developers that Impala > > can > > > > > runs > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > arm64, to find the compatibility in time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? Or maybe there is any other good > > suggestion? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Waiting for your reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
