Yeah, I don't think Cloudera owns the copyright to either (Mustache was
written by me, and is hosted on my private Github). Even if they did, I
don't think there's any compelling reason to grant the copyright to the
ASF. Both components would be replaceable if it was ever required.

On 6 October 2016 at 08:55, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't know much about mustache, but as far as Squeasel goes, Cloudera
> doesn't own the copyright and thus can't contribute it. It's a fork of
> another project (Mongoose) which switched licensing to an incompatible one
> once we were already using it. Due to the license switch, we made a copy of
> the prior release that we were using and renamed it. But, the copyright
> still remains with the original authors, as far as I understand.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Jim Apple <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The Impala community, with our mentors, should decide if we should
> > request from CLoudera na additional software grant for our thirdparty
> > components.
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d0c3482cccb3d8bc0a121c14bd269c
> > 98fb078213e79432ad164d4e62@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Mustache and Squeasel are small components (4202 lines of code, total)
> > and we can include them in Impala because they are permissively
> > licensed. However, it may make sense for them to have a software grant
> > to the ASF if they "contain a patented algorithm or [are] core to how
> > Impala works".
> >
> > My suspicion is that they do not and are not.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera

Reply via email to