I was looking through open JIRAs to make sure I didn't drop the ball on any buffer pool changes and discovered we have 100+ open JIRAs targeted for 2.10: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12341748
It would be great to clean those up. I tried to clean up the ones that I know something about but most of them I'm not familiar with. It looks like a lot aren't being actively worked on so probably belong in the backlog - the target version seems to just be expressing a hope that someone else will fix it soon. You can check your own 2.10 JIRAs with this filter: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12341563 There are also a bunch of unassigned ones: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12341750 On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Bharath Vissapragada < [email protected]> wrote: > Agreed Tim. > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Tim Armstrong <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Sounds good to me. We should coordinate to make sure that all of > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-3200 (the buffer pool > > changes) > > and related fixes make it into the release. > > > > - Tim > > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Jim Apple <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This sounds like a good idea to me. Thank you for volunteering! > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Bharath Vissapragada > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > It has been almost 2 months since we released Apache Impala > > (incubating) > > > > 2.9.0 and there have been new feature improvements and a good number > of > > > bug > > > > fixes checked in since then. > > > > > > > > I propose that we release 2.10.0 soon and I volunteer to be its > release > > > > manager. Please speak up and let the community know if anyone has any > > > > objections to this. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bharath > > > > > >
