On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:57:53AM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote: > Caolan McNamara wrote: > >On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 15:53 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: > >> > >>I would like to continue to provide 680 milestones as before 2.0 > >>release. Since these snapshots are mainly for QA purpose I would like to > >>have these snapshots installed in parallel with the stable releases. > >> > >>for that reason we can't simply release a 2.0.135 since than the > [...] > >On the rpm ordering side of things perhaps making snapshots along the > >way to 2.0.1 of > >openoffice.org-2.0.1-0.m > >[...] > Wouldn't this still remove 2.0.0 in favor of 2.0.1-0.135 ?
Yes. > Actually I think the only way I to keep 2.0.0 on disk when installing > 2.0.1-pre is to change the package names to something like > openoffice.org-core01-dev etc. . The desktop-integration packages would > still conflict - due to famous /usr/bin/soffice :(. Yes. > Maybe it is time to release 'real' tarballs for those who want to keep > 2.0.0 around .. cd /where/did/I/unpack/the/download/RPMS/ for i in *.rpm ; do rpm2cpio $i | cpio -idmv; done mv opt/* ~/dev_build_dir/ Is about the same as cd /where/did/I/download/the/file tar zxvf <donwload>.tar.gz mv opt/* /dev_build_dir/ ciao Christian -- NP: Jimi Hendrix - Dolly Dagger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
