Hi All,
One thing I have noticed recently that almost all discussion has moved either
to the review list or is not happening on any list.
That's not good for including new contributors.
At least I no longer have an idea what you guys are working on, so I'll
probably just concentrate on reviewing releases.
Also couldn't I see any Email mentioning any planed releases ("- We'd like to
try to release the first binary version under the guide of
mentors in the next month.") So I guess this has been discussed off-list.
Keep in mind, even if most of you might be closely communicating,
others can't participate in this. So in order to grow a community, you have to
make others feel part of the team, by including them in
discussions like this.
In other podlings I'm involved in, sometimes a contributor is sitting next to
me, but I still ask him to post his questions on the list
Or I write summaries myself and post them. You should start doing the same.
Chris
Am 01.03.19, 15:51 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>:
Hi,
The following is the draft.
IoTDB
IoTDB is a data store for managing large amounts of time series data such as
timestamped data from IoT sensors in industrial applications.
IoTDB has been incubating since 2018-11-18.
Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
1. Release the first version;
2. refactor codes which are hard to understand for new developers, and
supply more design documents
to help new developers.
3. Attract more contributors;
Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?
- no.
How has the community developed since the last report?
- 4 new contributors joined the community: review and modify the English
documents, add Apache Calcite adaptor demo, and discuss in the mailing list.
- Mailing list:
-- dev@mailing list: 59 emails are sent, and can be divided into 18
threads (Apache Jenkins Pipeline notifications are exclude)
-- reviews@mailing list: more than 420 mails are sent, for code review
and new branch creation notifications.
How has the project developed since the last report?
- 48 PR are proposed totally, and 42 PR are merged.
- 16 authors have pushed 50 commits to master and 110 commits to all
branches.
- 31 issues (bugs, and feature requests) are logged on JIRA, 15 of them
are resolved.
- Dockerfile is created, which can attract more users to try IoTDB.
How would you assess the podling's maturity?
- The project is growing.
Please feel free to add your own commentary.
- We'd like to try to release the first binary version under the guide of
mentors in the next month.
[ ] Initial setup
[ x ] Working towards first release
[ x ] Community building
[ ] Nearing graduation
[ ] Other:
Date of last release:
- N/A
When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
- N/A
Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling
through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues
that need to be addressed.
- very Helpful.
Signed-off-by:
[](iotdb) Justin Mclean
Comments:
[](iotdb) Christofer Dutz
Comments:
[](iotdb) Willem Ning Jiang
Comments:
[](iotdb) Kevin McGrail
Comments:
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 于2019年2月28日周四 下午5:54写道：
> Please draft a report in the mail list first, in this way we can get
> some feedbacks from the community.
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:13 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear podling,
> >
> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > prepare your quarterly board report.
> >
> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 March 2019, 10:30 am PDT.
> > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > submission (Wed, March 06).
> >
> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> > meeting.
> >
> > Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
> > elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
> > PPMC members in your report.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The Apache Incubator PMC
> >
> > Submitting your Report
> >
> > ----------------------
> >
> > Your report should contain the following:
> >
> > * Your project name
> > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > the project or necessarily of its field
> > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards graduation.
> > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware of
> > * How has the community developed since the last report
> > * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > * How does the podling rate their own maturity.
> >
> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2019
> >
> > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > this page is created from a template.
> >
> > Mentors
> > -------
> >
> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> > for the Incubator PMC.
> >
> > Incubator PMC
>
