Hi Zhu, Thanks for your PR! I address a minor change request for the PR. After fixing that, I think the PR can be merged :D
Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午9:02写道： > Hi, > > Thanks Zhu, agree with your suggestion :D > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Boris Zhu <[email protected]> 于2019年8月7日周三 下午4:33写道： > >> Hi Xiangdong, >> These ways to write documents was what I saw in Apache Flink. I think >> it's a good way to co-write documents in the community. It can be applied >> to upcoming detailed documents. >> >> Tianci >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Boris Zhu <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3 >> To: <[email protected]> >> >> >> After this PR, https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/332, I >> think we should rewrite some documents as Chris Dutz >> <https://github.com/chrisdutz>suggests, especially readme.md and >> quickstart. I remember quickstart requires users to compile source code >> then use it instead of using binary directly. It's inconvenient for many >> users. The documents still have little mistakes. I think the following >> steps should be followed in order to avoid mistakes. >> >> First, we should develop a uniform way of writing documents. >> >> Second, someone opens an issue for writing a specific document and assign >> it to someone(seem like I don't have the right to assign an issue in apache >> Jira and there are still many issues not to be assigned). >> >> third, someone reviews the documents. >> >> Boris. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:11 PM Julian Feinauer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> please keep all discussions around the RC here so that we have the Vote >>> thread for VOTES only! >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Julian >>> >>
