Hi Kev,

thank you fort he vote : )
Indeed, now we are full (IPMC wise) : )

But Justin also promised me to do this (and I always have a good feeling when I 
see his +1 as hes really a world-class release voter...).

Julian

Am 12.08.19, 16:32 schrieb "Kevin A. McGrail" <[email protected]>:

    Please accept my vote +1 binding, them.  I have checked over the zip
    files, compiled the server and client but not run them.  Tere is the
    minor readme issue which I don't think is a hold up
    (https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/335)  Looking forward to
    this release.
    
    On 8/12/2019 10:27 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote:
    > Hi Xiangdong,
    >
    > I left the vote open for 2 reasons.
    > First, we currently have only 2 PPMC Votes.
    > Chris vote also counts as PPMC Vote so we could close the vote with 3 +1 
Votes (not 4, mine is not binding for PPMC).
    >
    > Second, we only have 2 binding IPMC Votes and I'd like to bring it to 
general@ with 3 IPMC Votes as I think it’s a good practice for Podlings.
    >
    > But, I suggest that some more PPMC members participate in the vote. Its 
not so good to pass votes only with mentor votes when there are enough people 
in the PPMC.
    > The PPMC currently has 20 members, so I personally would like to see at 
least 10 Votes from the PPMC but we could, of course also close it earlier.
    >
    > But I want at least 3 PPMC votes and 3 IPMC Votes before closing and this 
should be doable : )
    >
    > Julian
    >
    > Am 12.08.19, 15:58 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>:
    >
    >     Hi,
    >     
    >     If there is no more voters... how about ending the vote?  There are 4 
+1
    >     votes now.
    >     
    >     Best,
    >     -----------------------------------
    >     Xiangdong Huang
    >     School of Software, Tsinghua University
    >     
    >      黄向东
    >     清华大学 软件学院
    >     
    >     
    >     Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2019年8月10日周六 下午4:04写道:
    >     
    >     > Hi,
    >     >
    >     > One more from my side... We should not focus on the binaries in the 
Readme.
    >     > 8 think it's better to prepare a nice download and getting started 
site
    >     > where we explain.
    >     > There we can focus on binaries, that's fine.
    >     >
    >     > And downdload site we need after all before sending out an announce 
(after
    >     > IPMC vote finished successfully).
    >     >
    >     > Julian
    >     >
    >     > Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
    >     > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3
    >     > Von: Justin Mclean
    >     > An: [email protected]
    >     > Cc:
    >     >
    >     > Hi,
    >     >
    >     > > I carefully think again and again, I still think it could be 
better that
    >     > if
    >     > > we can update the README.md file in the release version..
    >     >
    >     > Releases don’t have to be perfect, they just need to be better than 
the
    >     > previous release. As this is the first release then anything you 
release is
    >     > going to be better than what you had previously.
    >     >
    >     > If there is an issue with a previous release you can alway make a 
new one
    >     > to fix any issue some time in the future.
    >     >
    >     > It would be good to see more of the PPMC vote on this release. 
There are
    >     > after all 20 of you! When you’re a TLP you’ll not have mentors and 
need to
    >     > vote on your own releases.
    >     >
    >     > (As an aside I can see that 6 of the 20 PPMC members are not signed 
up to
    >     > the private list, it is a requirement that you do so).
    >     >
    >     > Thanks,
    >     > Justin
    >     >
    >     
    >
    
    -- 
    Kevin A. McGrail
    Member, Apache Software Foundation
    Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
    
    

Reply via email to