I see, thanks for your explanation for IOTDB-300[1] and double check the IOTDB-268[2] Jialin! :)
Best, Jincheng @sunjincheng121 <https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-300 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-268 Jialin Qiao <qiaojia...@apache.org> 于2019年12月18日周三 下午3:47写道： > Hi, > > IOTDB-300 is already fixed in 0.9.0. It is a bug introduced in > 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT, therefore it is not included in the Release_Notes from > 0.8.0 to 0.9.0. > > If I don't misunderstand, IOTDB-268 is not a blocker issue that affects the > running of spark-iotdb-connector module. It is just a new feature that > wants a new format of timestamp in spark-iotdb-connector. > > Thanks, > Jialin Qiao > > jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月18日周三 下午3:23写道： > > > +1 for release IoTDB 0.9.1 as IOTDB-300 is very important fix. > > > > And I think the blocker issue [1] should be contains in 0.9.1, or someone > > should check is whether a blocker issue. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Best, > > Jincheng > > @sunjincheng121 <https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121> > > > > [1] [IOTDB-268] When using spark-iotdb-connector, the read time is > > timestamp > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-268> > > > > Lei Rui <nezhaleg...@163.com> 于2019年12月18日周三 下午2:30写道： > > > > > Hi Jialin, > > > > > > > > > That's nice. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > Lei Rui > > > > > > > > > On 12/18/2019 14:25，Jialin Qiao<qiaojia...@apache.org> wrote： > > > Hi, > > > > > > That's very kind of you :) I'd like to offer help and share my > > experience > > > if you meet trouble when releasing. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jialin Qiao > > > > > > Lei Rui <nezhaleg...@163.com> 于2019年12月18日周三 下午2:13写道： > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > I want to challenge myself to be the release manager of 0.9.1. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Lei Rui > > > > > > > > > On 12/17/2019 20:47，Jialin Qiao<qiaojia...@apache.org> wrote： > > > Hi, > > > > > > Change list could be inferred from merged PRs in > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pulse > > > > > > The second, as far as I know, there is no need to do more patches, > cause > > I > > > already cherry-pick all the bug-fix commits, but double-check is > better. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jialin Qiao > > > > > > Xiangdong Huang <saint...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月17日周二 下午8:40写道： > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > +1 for releasing 0.9.1. > > > > > > Two concerns: > > > > > > Actually, when I merge the bug-fix PRs, I also cherry-pick them into > > > rel/0.9. Therefore, this release will be easier than 0.9.0... > > > > > > So, how to maintain the change list? > > > > > > The second is similar, how many patches should be involved into 0.9.1? > > > > > > Best, > > > ----------------------------------- > > > Xiangdong Huang > > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > > > 黄向东 > > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > > > > Jialin Qiao <qiaojia...@apache.org> 于2019年12月17日周二 下午8:27写道： > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > After releasing 0.9.0, we fixed some bugs that will impact the user > > > experience. It's time to release 0.9.1, a bug-fix version of 0.9.0. Is > > > there anyone who wants to be the release manager? > > > > > > Actually, when I merge the bug-fix PRs, I also cherry-pick them into > > > rel/0.9. Therefore, this release will be easier than 0.9.0... > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ————————————————— > > > Jialin Qiao > > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > > > 乔嘉林 > > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ————————————————— > > > Jialin Qiao > > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > > > 乔嘉林 > > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ————————————————— > > > Jialin Qiao > > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > > > 乔嘉林 > > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > > > -- > ————————————————— > Jialin Qiao > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 乔嘉林 > 清华大学 软件学院 >
