Hi Jialin,

It’s nice of you to help refactor the labels.

Last week, I add a label named “solution” for the issues which are solutions of 
common / uncommon issues, like [1].

Do you think it is acceptable?

[1] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues/2039

Best,
-----------------------------------
Zesong Sun
School of Software, Tsinghua University

孙泽嵩
清华大学 软件学院

> 2020年11月16日 14:32,Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> Hi Benedict,
> 
> Welcome!  +1 for adding labels in github issue. I could help refactor the 
> labels.
> 
> I do not remember the result of the discussion last year... 
> I suggest enhancing the github issue, since most people just look through the 
> github issue instead of Jira.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
> 
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
> 
> &gt; -----原始邮件-----
> &gt; 发件人: "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>
> &gt; 发送时间: 2020-11-16 11:31:40 (星期一)
> &gt; 收件人: dev <[email protected]>
> &gt; 抄送: 
> &gt; 主题: Re: Some suggestions about label
> &gt; 
> &gt; Hi,
> &gt; 
> &gt; Thanks.
> &gt; I think we had discussed this topic about one year ago, and then we added
> &gt; some modules in JIRA.
> &gt; 
> &gt; +1 to re-organize the modules in jira and labels of github issue. :D
> &gt; 
> &gt; Best,
> &gt; -----------------------------------
> &gt; Xiangdong Huang
> &gt; School of Software, Tsinghua University
> &gt; 
> &gt;  黄向东
> &gt; 清华大学 软件学院
> &gt; 
> &gt; 
> &gt; Benedict Jin <[email protected]> 于2020年11月15日周日 下午11:46写道:
> &gt; 
> &gt; &gt; Hello everyone. I am new here. I see a lot of active issues and pull
> &gt; &gt; requests in our project. It can be seen that the community is very 
> active.
> &gt; &gt; If possible, I would like to make a little suggestion about label. 
> We can
> &gt; &gt; learn from some experience of Apache Druid. The label 
> classification can be
> &gt; &gt; improved in terms of the difficulty of the problem, the kind of 
> module, and
> &gt; &gt; third-party components. Initial communication with @乔嘉林, the 
> modules can
> &gt; &gt; probably be summarized as cli, python-client, java-client, jdbc,
> &gt; &gt; c++-client, go-client, storage-engine, query-processing, wal, 
> documents,
> &gt; &gt; examples, query planner, sql parser, file sync, schema manager, 
> compaction,
> &gt; &gt; rpc, cluster etc. And summarize the third-party components into
> &gt; &gt; hadoop-tsfile, hive-tsfile, spark-tsfile, spark-iotdb, flink-tsfile,
> &gt; &gt; flink-iotdb, rocketmq-iotdb, grafana etc.
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt; &gt; In addition, it is also considered whether jira can be unified in 
> github
> &gt; &gt; issues for management. On the one hand, it can be unified to 
> facilitate
> &gt; &gt; retrieval, and on the other hand, considering the network 
> environment may
> &gt; &gt; make it impossible to access jira in some areas. Finally, I wish the
> &gt; &gt; project better.
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt; &gt; FYI, https://github.com/apache/druid/labels .
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt; &gt;
> </[email protected]></[email protected]></[email protected]>

Reply via email to