Hi Xiangdong, Thanks for your comments. I am glad you support this refactoring suggestion. I personally feel that the sooner we refactor, the more we can benefit from it.
Regards, Benedict Jin On 2020/11/16 03:31:40, Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks. > I think we had discussed this topic about one year ago, and then we added > some modules in JIRA. > > +1 to re-organize the modules in jira and labels of github issue. :D > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Benedict Jin <[email protected]> 于2020年11月15日周日 下午11:46写道： > > > Hello everyone. I am new here. I see a lot of active issues and pull > > requests in our project. It can be seen that the community is very active. > > If possible, I would like to make a little suggestion about label. We can > > learn from some experience of Apache Druid. The label classification can be > > improved in terms of the difficulty of the problem, the kind of module, and > > third-party components. Initial communication with @乔嘉林, the modules can > > probably be summarized as cli, python-client, java-client, jdbc, > > c++-client, go-client, storage-engine, query-processing, wal, documents, > > examples, query planner, sql parser, file sync, schema manager, compaction, > > rpc, cluster etc. And summarize the third-party components into > > hadoop-tsfile, hive-tsfile, spark-tsfile, spark-iotdb, flink-tsfile, > > flink-iotdb, rocketmq-iotdb, grafana etc. > > > > In addition, it is also considered whether jira can be unified in github > > issues for management. On the one hand, it can be unified to facilitate > > retrieval, and on the other hand, considering the network environment may > > make it impossible to access jira in some areas. Finally, I wish the > > project better. > > > > FYI, https://github.com/apache/druid/labels . > > > > >
