I think you should update the master branch again. We have improved the performance, which includes a little API change on the storage option, but InfluxDB is safe for now. I know the official codebase is at GitLab, but in the process, I would recommend you to use your GitHub fork. It would be easier to review, and you could adopt our e2e test framework, which covers InfluxDB cases in the GitHub Action processes.
If you need more helps, welcome to talk with your mentor, and I could join your meeting to support if you need. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 刘威 <[email protected]> 于2021年7月21日周三 下午7:19写道： > Hi, I'm a participant in Summer 2021 of Open Source Promotion Plan. My > name is Liu Wei, I come from Northwestern Polytechnical University(NWPU), > Xi'an, China.I'm working on creating an IOTDB-Skywalking Adapter. Hope to > join community to get more help. > > > I follow the guide Extend storage | Apache SkyWalking to build my > code skeleton and take the Influxdb storage solution as a reference. My > Mentor Xiangdong Huang discussed this project with me and gave me some > suggestions. What's more, I have pushed my code to Summer2021 / > 210070771 · GitLab (summer-ospp.ac.cn) in iotdb-adapter branch. > > > Now I have a question: > 1. Which skywalking version should I base? I pulled skywalking master in > June 12th. Maybe it's not stable enough to develop a new storage > solution. (My IoTDB version is 0.12.2.) > 2. Do you have other helpful information or resources? Please give me some > suggestions. Thanks you in advance. > > > Hope to get reply.
