Please ignore me~I will start another thread~
On 2024/08/20 04:08:44 Xinyu Tan wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently in our community, non-Committer contributors cannot actively > trigger CI when contributing PRs to IoTDB. It requires a Committer to click > to trigger CI, which causes some inconvenience. > > By learning and understanding the Apache standards[1], we found that each > repository can allow up to 10 non-Committers to trigger CI when submitting > PRs. In addition, there are already Apache projects (such as Apache Doris[2]) > that have done similar work[3]. > > In order to enhance the open-source experience for non-Committer > contributors, we would like to provide the convenience of automatically > running CI after submitting PRs for contributors with the following > characteristics: > > 1. Have consistently contributed to IoTDB with more than 5 commits in the > past 12 months[4]. > 2. Are expected to continue to contribute to IoTDB in the next 12 months. > 3. Do not misuse IoTDB's CI resources for illegal matters (such as mining, > etc.). > > Contributors who wish to become part of the above group, please reply to this > email with your Github ID and the number of commits you have contributed in > the past 12 months. If there are more than 10 contributors responding, it may > be sorted by the number of commits from high to low and select the top 10 > contributors. > > It is expected that this email will last for about a week. Next week, I will > summarize the emails, calculate the results, and initiate the final round of > public announcement. If there are no issues, I will submit a PR. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=Git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-AssigningexternalcollaboratorswiththetriageroleonGitHub > [2] https://github.com/apache/doris > [3] https://github.com/apache/doris/blob/master/.asf.yaml#L131 > [4] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/graphs/contributors > > Best > ------------- > Xinyu Tan > Apache IoTDB PMC > > On 2024/08/19 14:46:23 Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Running that on the master branch in the CI wouldn’t be helpful, as the CI > > shouldn’t be allowed to commit changes to the codebase. > > That’s why I’m suggesting calling the “apply” instead of the “check” goal > > in our build. > > > > Chris > > > > Von: liyuheng <[email protected]> > > Datum: Montag, 19. August 2024 um 15:02 > > An: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] How about running spotless:apply instead of > > spotless:check in the build? > > Hi, Chris > > > > Auto spotless is a great idea. For my opinion, we can do auto spotless in > > master branch one time every day, and remove other spotless check. > > > > And +1 for spotless is still necessary. > > >
