Hi all, As you know, I have brought up several topics repeatedly over the last few years. Things that I personally require to continue using IoTDB.
* Living the base-java-version to Java 17 * Switching from JavaX to Jakarta namespace * Switching from Singletons to Dependency Injection (Spring) * Developing on „develop“ and not „master“ (We voted for that years ago but never did the switch) As recently all of them have been denied or ignored, I have created a personal fork where I applied these changes. So now I’m asking … is there interest in this from side of the Project? If yes, I’m happy to whip up a PR (Even if it’s most probably a HUGE one). If not, I’ll probably keep on working on my fork and keeping it closed but stop going the extra mile for making it able to go back into IoTDB and fully go nuts about it, forming it fully into what I would like it to be like. * Replacing the MQTT support with one based on an MQTT client and not an MQTT Broker. * Stripping DataNode into it’s bare essentials * Moving all current DataNode extensions into separate plugins. * Allowing inner-VM communication between config- and data-node. Chris
