Hi,
On 3/29/06, Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> jackrabbit-jcr-webdav
>
> > Do you prefer jackrabbit-jcr-server?
>
> yes... not because i think its a very good name.
> but 'jackrabbit-jcr-webdav' focus too much on
> the webdav part. the aim of the original contrib
> was not focused on webdav (see the 'webapp' project).
Good point. I still think that Roy's point about Jackrabbit branding
applies, so adding the jackrabbit prefix would make sense. Just adding
the prefix (and a version number to the war) would give us:
jackrabbit-jcr-server-1.0-src.jar
jackrabbit-jcr-webdav-1.0.jar
jackrabbit-jcr-client-1.0.jar
jackrabbit-jcr-server-1.0.jar
jackrabbit-server-1.0.war
Would you be OK with this?
> perhaps there are simply too much things in a
> single project. but i would rather keep the
> current name and think about a meaningful split
> of webdav and non-webdav as well as jcr- and
> non-jcr-specific parts for a next release.
Agreed, it might be clearer to better separate the subprojects, but
there's no point rushing that.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
