Hi Angela,
So, i'm waiting your proposition. Why not doing it on the wiki, maybe
it's a good place for working on it.
For the review, wait, don't waste your time. I will send you later a
new version with yours advices.
Jérémi
On 4/13/06, Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi jérémi
>
> >>since i would like to take advantage of your patch to think about a better
> >>structure and how we can package things ('simple' is probably not an
> >>appropiate package name), i would suggest that to have this solved before
> >>we commit the extensions.
> >>hope that's fine.
>
> > Sure. what kind of changes you want to do?
>
> i'd like to
> - sort out the webdav part from the 'jcr-server'
> (see discussion regarding package naming before the
> 1.0 release).
> - separate 'simple' and 'jcr' packages (which are currently
> together in the server) and find a solution for those
> classes inside the jcr-package that in fact are common
> classes for both implementations.
> - find a solution for the suggestion mikhail posted yesterday.
> basically those 3 issues belong together.
>
> finally i would like to build a basis for further development
> of the 'simple' server, which is not simple any more. i think it
> would be wise to do this, before we add further extensions to
> the 'simple' package.
> your patch was a perfect start for this :))
>
> so i'm currently working on an initial proposal in order to
> have a discussion basis.
>
> > I was not here at the beginning of the week, but i will finish the
> > IOhandler for the version maybe tomorrow.
>
> no need to hurry. i still owe you a review anyway :).
> regards
> angela
>
--
Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org
skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
