The more I work with Graffito ocm the more I like it. The code is first-rate and deserves to leave incubation. However, the ocm code has very few dependencies on Jackrabbit. Why is it then to be a Jackrabbit sub-project? One can connect this ocm tool to a non-JR Content Repository with very little effort.

For that reason, I do not see Graffito ocm as a sub-project of Jackrabbit (assuming "Jackrabbit" is the name of the repository implementation).

At the risk of being pedantic, let me suggest to you the idea of an Apache Content Repository Project, with Jackrabbit, OCM and CDNUtils being co-equal sub-projects (in parallel with the Apache (R)DB Project having Derby, JDO and DdUtils as its co-equal sub-projects).

   -- Dan


Reply via email to