[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537862
]
Julian Reschke commented on JCR-1152:
-------------------------------------
> - QValue (or its factory) is in charge of defining the required format of a
> Reference values
> i.e. this is delegated to the SPI implementation.
Correct.
> consequently we can probably get rid if the second valuefactory i moved to
> jcr-commons,
> can't we?
We won't need the ValueFactory and the ValueImpls anymore. Maybe we can also
get rid of some utility classes for conversion.
> - I would be possible to have SPI implementation that uses a separate data
> store for
> binaries and have the entries created immediately upon creation of a JCR
> Value. at
> least theoretically...
Correct.
> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both
> ValueFactory and QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SPI
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is
> sufficient.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
