[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537861
]
angela commented on JCR-1152:
-----------------------------
from my understanding this would also mean
- QValue (or its factory) is in charge of defining the required format of a
Reference values
i.e. this is delegated to the SPI implementation.
consequently we can probably get rid if the second valuefactory i moved to
jcr-commons,
can't we?
- I would be possible to have SPI implementation that uses a separate data
store for
binaries and have the entries created immediately upon creation of a JCR
Value. at
least theoretically...
> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both
> ValueFactory and QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SPI
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is
> sufficient.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
