[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547609
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-1242:
---------------------------------------
the references are persisted using the serializer because i simply forgot to do
this with the binding :-) and then after a while no one bothered :-). but if
course it would be better to use the binding as well.
however i agree with stefan that chaning the read/writerPropertyId() is a bit
dangerous. it might be used by third-party persistence manager, and it's not
private to jackrabbit core.
i would use a 'read/writeIndexedPropertyId()'.
regards, toby
> Improve serialization of NodeReferences for BundleDB PMs
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1242
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jackrabbit-core
> Affects Versions: 1.3.3, 1.4
> Reporter: Przemo Pakulski
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: JCR-1242.patch
>
>
> BudleDB PMs use currently Serializer class to serialize, deserialize node
> references. Those methods are unefficient, it use string representation of
> UUID, namespaceURI and localName.
> For UUID rawBytes should be used and for namespaceURI, localName
> namespaceIndex/nameIndex should be used to improve efficiency of
> serialization/deserialization.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
