Hi, On Jan 22, 2008 3:07 PM, Angela Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -1 You're proposing a switch from CTR to RTC. > > i'm not proposing this. you are mistaken.
ACK, understood. Your original comment seemed like a general observation about all changes. > but i expect that we are careful regarding code > that is more than an internal detail. and that > we don't make changes forth and back.... +1 Agreed. > and in this case waiting a couple of days would > not have done any harm. You're right. However, since the JCR-1331 change was relatively small and I was quite convinced that it was the right thing to do I rather made the change right away instead of waiting and introducing another "context switch" a few days later. That was a mistake but I don't think it's that big a deal, since there's no harm in reverting a change if people object or want more time for review. I think you were perfectly right in calling for the changes to be reverted, but I don't see the issue as a symptom of a more widespread hastiness. IMHO our current workflow with voluntary reviews works pretty well. BR, Jukka Zitting
