David Rauschenbach wrote:
2. Per Julian's suggestion, I also support the notion that it's a shame getQNodeTypeDefintions supports a filter, whereas a filter is not supported where it's needed most.
can you please elaborate on this? I understand we changed the node type definition handling at some point to lazily load them when needed and only retrieve them all if a client wants to iterate through them all using the respective JCR API method.
regards marcel
