i agree
On 5/20/08, Marcel Reutegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > commons-collection is quite heavy weight. if we can get rid of it (as a > jcr-commons dependency) that would be great. > > regards > marcel > > > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As noted in JCR-1615, the transitive commons-collections dependency of > > jcr-commons is not always desirable. > > > > We could drop the commons-collections dependency from jcr-commons at a > > slight cost to clients (extra adapter code needed for use with the > > predicate/filter features of commons-collections). > > > > I originally considered the commons-collections dependency generic and > > useful enough to be required by jcr-commons, but since there's a > > reported case where it's not considered useful we may want to > > reconsider having the dependency. In a way it would be cleanest if > > jcr-commons only depended on Java 1.4 and the JCR API. > > > > WDYT? > > > > BR, > > > > Jukka Zitting > > > > > >
