Hi, On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I originally considered the commons-collections dependency generic and > useful enough to be required by jcr-commons, but since there's a > reported case where it's not considered useful we may want to > reconsider having the dependency. In a way it would be cleanest if > jcr-commons only depended on Java 1.4 and the JCR API.
See JCR-1617 for a proposed patch that covers both commons-collections and slf4j-api. BR, Jukka Zitting
