Hi Florent, this looks like an interesting project! It would be nice if you could at some point in time give some more details about your proposed architecture. Is this following the guideline David presented at the CMIS TC meeting? Meaning is there a common abstraction layer hiding the protocol specific bindings? Will this be only server or server and client?
Jens -----Original Message----- From: Florent Guillaume [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Samstag, 7. Februar 2009 01:57 To: [email protected] Subject: Working on CMIS Hi all, I'm from Nuxeo, and we plan on working a lot on CMIS in the coming months. We're very interested in the young but promising ideas embodied in the current jcr-cmis sandbox, because we plan on offering CMIS bindings on top of our current repository (Nuxeo 5.2). We'll be using and contributing to the API+client parts of the jcr-cmis project very soon, and I wanted to announce this to you first. Nuxeo has been using Jackrabbit as one of its underlying content storage for quite some time, and we're quite familiar with it. However for the time being our area of focus will not be the CMIS-to-JCR (server) part, but the building of a complete Java API and model for CMIS, and the bindings of AtomPub and SOAP to it. Internally we'll be writing a binding from the Java API to our Nuxeo Core API. I'm not yet an Apache committer so our contributions will take the form of patches for the time being. I'll be floating ideas soon about code and stuff :) Thanks, Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Head of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
