Hi, On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Marcel Reutegger<[email protected]> wrote: > not really criticizing this particular commit since I already reviewed > it and said it looks good ;) but I just noticed that we should now > rather use StringBuilder (available in Java 5) instead of synchronized > StringBuffer.
Or simply use the + operator which makes the code less verbose (and automatically uses StringBuilder when compiled for Java 5). BR, Jukka Zitting
