[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783675#action_12783675
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1456:
------------------------------------
OK, let's go with the separate package. Should we do this just for the
persistence managers, or all of the affected pieces (fs, data store, journal)?
I'd keep the non-pooled stuff around just for persistence managers since
they're the most critical part of the system.
> Database connection pooling
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-1456
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1456
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jackrabbit-core
> Reporter: Jukka Zitting
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: 777490.patch, dbcp.patch, dbcp.patch,
> JCR-1456-performance-trunk-test-setup.patch, JCR-1456-performance.txt,
> JCR-1456.patch, patch-1456-1.txt, patch-1456-2.txt, patch-1456-3.txt
>
>
> Jackrabbit should use database connection pools instead of a single
> connection per persistence manager, cluster journal, or database data store.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
