Hi, > In your opinion, which part make the most of performance contribution?
It's hard to say. I would rather spend my time to work on the prototype than to find out. To keep the prototype fast, it's important to always check performance. I guess we didn't always do that for Jackrabbit unfortunately. By the way, if you use a slower persistence layer then the gain will be much less. > Does prototype have similar cache size. Both Jackrabbit and the prototype use about 20 MB at the end of the run. The prototype uses a weak reference map (so does the current Jackrabbit as far as I know) and doesn't have to read data from the persistence layer. The current Jackrabbit does read, not sure why. If I disable this cache in the prototype, the test takes 0.24 seconds instead of 0.2 seconds. Regards, Thomas
