On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com> wrote: > I'm wondering what is the *most* problematic features to verify the > architecture: > - security > - orderable child nodes > - same name siblings > - locking > - transactions > - clustering > - observation > - workspaces > - node types > - large number of child nodes > - search > - correct path parsing and lookup > - multiple sessions >> cut some features to gian performance improvement. > I'm not sure. What features could be cut? Your list of *most* problematic features. Those features will be implemented on the prototype micro kernel, if they are plugged in as optional feature, then user can take out the feature if they want. Of course, the user need response for the consequence :)
-Guo
