On 2011-11-29 18:41, Michael Dürig wrote:
Internally, SET can always be implemented as atomic variant of
REMOVE-then-ADD.
In general yes. However for the Jackrabbit Microkernel use case this
becomes troublesome wrt. observation.
The diff format makes no promises about the observable events, so I
wouldn't worry about that.
What I'm worrying about is that when the format doesn't allow us to
implement JCR observation, we won't use it but rather a derivative of it.
Could you elaborate what the problem is?
Best regards, Julian
