Hi, On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > I just realized that in JCR 2.0, we may have forgotten to specify whether > node type related methods (addMixin, isNodeType etc) are supposed to take > expanded names. > > I believe they should, but I can't find anything related to it in the > JavaDocs. Should we raise this as a JSR-333 issue?
JCR 2.0 is already pretty clear on this. Section 3.2.6 [1] says: "When a JCR name is passed as an argument to a JCR method it may be in either expanded or qualified form." [1] http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.6%20Use%20of%20Qualified%20and%20Expanded%20Names BR, Jukka Zitting
