On 2012-05-27 01:55, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Julian Reschke<[email protected]> wrote:
I just realized that in JCR 2.0, we may have forgotten to specify whether
node type related methods (addMixin, isNodeType etc) are supposed to take
expanded names.
I believe they should, but I can't find anything related to it in the
JavaDocs. Should we raise this as a JSR-333 issue?
JCR 2.0 is already pretty clear on this. Section 3.2.6 [1] says: "When
a JCR name is passed as an argument to a JCR method it may be in
either expanded or qualified form."
[1]
http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.6%20Use%20of%20Qualified%20and%20Expanded%20Names
Very good. OAK currently doesn't do this, so it seems we don't have TCK
coverage for it...
Best regards, Julian
