Hi, On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Hui Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > anybody get a change to test the code? it would be something nice to have in > additional to the persistence managers out there already.
Can you test the code against plain Jackrabbit instead of CRX/CQ? Also, it would be easier for us to help if you had a simple test case that illustrates the problem. Having the MongoDB PM code you included earlier and the test case as a patch that I can apply against Jackrabbit trunk would be ideal. Note that there's been other efforts to implement the Jackrabbit PM interface based on NoSQL databases, but such efforts commonly encounter the issue that Jackrabbit 2.x expects the operation of saving transient changes to be atomic. Do you have a way to ensure that with MongoDB? BR, Jukka Zitting
