i can certainly make a patch for you to test if you can give me some lead how to do it. i never involved with open source development before.
thanks - Steven On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Hui Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > anybody get a change to test the code? it would be something nice to > have in > > additional to the persistence managers out there already. > > Can you test the code against plain Jackrabbit instead of CRX/CQ? > > Also, it would be easier for us to help if you had a simple test case > that illustrates the problem. Having the MongoDB PM code you included > earlier and the test case as a patch that I can apply against > Jackrabbit trunk would be ideal. > > Note that there's been other efforts to implement the Jackrabbit PM > interface based on NoSQL databases, but such efforts commonly > encounter the issue that Jackrabbit 2.x expects the operation of > saving transient changes to be atomic. Do you have a way to ensure > that with MongoDB? > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > ***** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system. *****
