Hi, we probably have the TCK test in place because the spec explicitly says the map is empty in those cases. see 12.3.2 Event Information. on the other hand, I don't see a reason why an implementation shouldn't be allowed to pass more information than required.
I'd say we create an issue for JCR 2.1 and propose a weaker contract. Regards Marcel On 08/07/14 17:52, "Michael Dürig" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi, > >Often it would be helpful if observation events would carry node type >information. In Oak we added some initial support for this [1] by adding >the node type and the mixin types of the associated node of an event to >the info map. > >In JCR-3765 [2] I suggested to backport this functionality to >Jackrabbit. However this will cause the GetInfoTest TCK test to fail. >That test asserts that the info map is empty for all non move events. >What do people think about adapting the test expectations of this test >and allow for said entries? > >Michael > > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1661 >[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3765
