Good point. I created https://java.net/jira/browse/JSR_333-75
Michael
On 9.7.14 8:48 , Marcel Reutegger wrote:
Hi,
we probably have the TCK test in place because the spec explicitly
says the map is empty in those cases. see 12.3.2 Event Information.
on the other hand, I don't see a reason why an implementation shouldn't
be allowed to pass more information than required.
I'd say we create an issue for JCR 2.1 and propose a weaker contract.
Regards
Marcel
On 08/07/14 17:52, "Michael Dürig" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Often it would be helpful if observation events would carry node type
information. In Oak we added some initial support for this [1] by adding
the node type and the mixin types of the associated node of an event to
the info map.
In JCR-3765 [2] I suggested to backport this functionality to
Jackrabbit. However this will cause the GetInfoTest TCK test to fail.
That test asserts that the info map is empty for all non move events.
What do people think about adapting the test expectations of this test
and allow for said entries?
Michael
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1661
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3765
