There seems to be a mistake in the readme.md. It says: 2. Review the site at `vault-doc/target/site`
The path doesn’t look right to me. Is this a copy & paste error? Konrad > Am 06.04.2015 um 08:08 schrieb Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > I converted most of the site [0]. I'm not quite finished with the final > structure, but at least it gives a usable result. > > to build: > 1. svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/trunk > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/trunk> > 2. mvn clean site > 3. open target/site/index.html > > if you think this is ok, I'll push it to the live site. > > btw: as you might realize, the "code" now lives in jackrabbit/site/trunk, > rather than jackrabbit/trunk/jackrabbit-site. should we keep it like this? I > think yes, since the overall site does not really need to be included in the > releases. however, the jackrabbit-1.x specific stuff, like the components > description should go to trunk. and the ocm to ocm. > > regards, toby > > [0] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/site/trunk/ > <https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/site/trunk/> > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Davide Giannella <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 01/04/2015 00:54, Tobias Bocanegra wrote: > >> ... > >> I would be willing to spend some time convert this to the markdown > >> approach we have in oak. I would no try to save the existing > >> look-and-feel, but at least to simplify the generation. > >> > >> WDYT? > > > > +1. > > > > I actually like the look and feel of the Oak website. I find it more > > readable. If it ease you, you could try sharing/reuse the CSS. > > thanks for the feedback. I started fiddling with it. tracked at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3865 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3865> > > regards, toby >
