On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote:

> There seems to be a mistake in the readme.md. It says:
> 2. Review the site at `vault-doc/target/site`
>
> The path doesn’t look right to me. Is this a copy & paste error?
>
oops. yes. should be just target/site

regards Toby.


> Konrad
>
>
> Am 06.04.2015 um 08:08 schrieb Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I converted most of the site [0]. I'm not quite finished with the final
> structure, but at least it gives a usable result.
>
> to build:
> 1. svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/site/trunk
> 2. mvn clean site
> 3. open target/site/index.html
>
> if you think this is ok, I'll push it to the live site.
>
> btw: as you might realize, the "code" now lives in jackrabbit/site/trunk,
> rather than jackrabbit/trunk/jackrabbit-site. should we keep it like this?
> I think yes, since the overall site does not really need to be included in
> the releases. however, the jackrabbit-1.x specific stuff, like the
> components description should go to trunk. and the ocm to ocm.
>
> regards, toby
>
> [0] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/site/trunk/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Davide Giannella <[email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>> > On 01/04/2015 00:54, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
>> >> ...
>> >> I would be willing to spend some time convert this to the markdown
>> >> approach we have in oak. I would no try to save the existing
>> >> look-and-feel, but at least to simplify the generation.
>> >>
>> >> WDYT?
>> >
>> > +1.
>> >
>> > I actually like the look and feel of the Oak website. I find it more
>> > readable. If it ease you, you could try sharing/reuse the CSS.
>>
>> thanks for the feedback. I started fiddling with it. tracked at
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3865
>>
>> regards, toby
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to