On 11.02.2020 11:52, Konrad Windszus wrote:
According to
https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.1%20Namespaces
<https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.1
Namespaces> an empty URI part is totally valid and should be used for
non-namespaced names!
...
I would call that a bug in the spec, at least in the context of expanded
names.
At the end of the day, "{}foo" is a valid local name, so it can't by
definition not also be an expanded name.
Best regards, Julian
