Buuhuu commented on a change in pull request #46:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/46#discussion_r533243860
##########
File path:
src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/filevault/maven/packaging/FormatDocviewXmlMojo.java
##########
@@ -109,7 +111,14 @@ public void execute() throws MojoExecutionException,
MojoFailureException {
getLog().info("Skip executing mojo 'format-xml' for incremental
builds as parameter 'enableForIncrementalBuilds' is set to 'false'");
} else {
File jcrSourceDirectory =
AbstractSourceAndMetadataPackageMojo.getFirstExistingDirectory(jcrRootSourceDirectory);
- executeInternal(jcrSourceDirectory);
+ if (jcrSourceDirectory != null) {
+ executeInternal(jcrSourceDirectory);
+ } else {
+ if (getLog().isDebugEnabled()) {
+ getLog().debug("None of the configured
jcrRootSourceDirectory directories exists, skipping: " +
Review comment:
afaik `org.apache.maven.plugin.logging.Log` does not support placeholder
replacement, thats why the check if `isDebugEnabled()`
Other Mojos may do the configuration validation. I don't see this being
necessary in the bounded context for "format xml". So said the debug log level
is correct from my perspective as "if the directory does not exist, do
nothing".
This change addressees the execution of the `format-xml` goal from command
line and even if unlikely it may not run in a maven project at all. So I would
rather not depend on the packaging here.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
